top | item 23749578

(no title)

num3ric | 5 years ago

Wise decision, but this renders the cost of education (in US universities) even more unjustifiable.

discuss

order

wpasc|5 years ago

Agreed entirely, but the cost of a US college degree is often more about the credential level signaling and showing that you were tenacious enough to win the college entrance competition than it is about acquiring skills.

staycoolboy|5 years ago

Wow, that's wickedly cynical.

I don't know how I would have learned how to become an RF engineer if it weren't for a four year BSEE that focused heavily on DiffEq, Complex Math, Fields & Waves, and Discrete Systems... and access to patient and friendly (mostly) professors for help during open office hours, which were a necessity (for me, anyway).

I'm pretty sure I would not have been able to teach this to myself with YouTube videos. But maybe you've had better luck?

itg|5 years ago

Also about networking and friendships formed during college which will be harder when it’s entirely online.

NotSammyHagar|5 years ago

That is extremely contrary to my experience. I could code a little bit before college but I learned more math, abstraction, theory of computation. I have never encountered anyone from my school professionally, but it was a modest state school. I did a ton of programming and that always mattered the most when I interviewed for jobs - what could I do and demonstrate right then. I have to ask, were you in engineering, where your connections mattered?

giarc|5 years ago

I tend to agree but online courses allows school to admit more people. Therefore the value of that limited resource should go down, along with the price. Although Harvard hasn't announced an increase in first year admittance, I suspect if this is succesful they will start to increase enrollment and therefore should bring the cost down.

catawbasam|5 years ago

If that was it, they could just copy their acceptance letters and start applying for jobs.

snarf21|5 years ago

Just like the job interview screening game.

tinyhouse|5 years ago

I would think the majority of non-rich Harvard students don't pay much. For undergraduate studies if you want to attract the best students you have to offer very generous scholarships. Otherwise they would lose students to other top schools. This is true for all schools, but the rich schools like Harvard have the funding to actually do it. I've met a couple of students who paid full tuition at Harvard, but both came from very wealthy families so it wasn't an issue. Schools know in advance the financial situation of applicants and plan accordingly.

affyboi|5 years ago

The Ivies tend to have pretty generous aid since they have massive endowments

asdff|5 years ago

I'm sure no small number of people will defer next year. Looking back at college me, I would lean on the side of not signing my college town lease, deferring for the year, and living with my parents in my hometown for a year along with the rest of my local friends (many of which have in fact escaped NYC and other cities rents and returned to their parents home for this work from home period).

Maybe you could work on something on github for your resume during this gap, but I'm anticipating given the absolute chaos this pandemic has caused worldwide, employers aren't going to care if you've failed to secure an internship in a time when no one is hiring, or that you preferred to take more engaging in person coursework rather than watch live action youtube lectures for exorbitant fees.

vincentmarle|5 years ago

On the other hand, if there are a lot of students deferring, there is a huge line behind them willing (and able!) to get into Harvard. Harvard and other elite institutions will not suffer for students for quite a while.

amiga_500|5 years ago

The price isn't set on the cost to deliver, at all.

It's based on ability to pay, which is based on available credit, which is based on whatever bankers can get away with saying lifetime earnings will be.

centimeter|5 years ago

> Wise decision

For whom? We're going to save ~0 QALY with this decision, but we're going to derail a lot of people's life plans and probably contribute to a lot of deaths of despair.

fullshark|5 years ago

The cost is incredibly justifiable, it's just you are paying for access to future opportunities not an education.

tinyhouse|5 years ago

No it's not. Knowledge should provide access to future opportunities, not prestige. The system is the problem.

bdcravens|5 years ago

It's not (or at least, doesn't have to be) a binary question; it's a sliding scale of ROI.