top | item 23795577

(no title)

GuiA | 5 years ago

I had a laptop with a physical switch for WiFi/Bluetooth in 2006 or so (with a matching orange/blue light that would turn up when you toggled it). The problem was that this was actually all done by a software driver - when I booted into Linux with the laptop I was surprised to find that the bluetooth/wifi modules were on regardless of the switch's position.

At the end of the day, unless you have a really nice microscope, solid understanding of electrical engineering, and a few tens of thousands of hours ahead of you, you have to trust whoever you're buying the hardware from that it will do what they say it will. No amount of hardware efforts can solve the fundamental human trust problem.

discuss

order

SAI_Peregrinus|5 years ago

I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T480. Its webcam switch is a slider that covers the webcam lens. You don't need a fancy microscope, or a solid understanding of EE, or tens of thousands of hours. You need the ability to see the slider cover the lens. Takes all of half a second and at least 1 eye.

stjohnswarts|5 years ago

Yeah but it's just as easy to put some black tape over most laptop cameras. Evidently apple decided to not consider that option

drdaeman|5 years ago

Plot twist: the slider material could be opaque in the visible spectrum but transparent in IR.

/s

valuearb|5 years ago

And the hackers still win, cause no one remembers to slide it shut after a call, and they can hack the led so there is no physical indicator when they are watching.

basch|5 years ago

It would be pretty impressive for someone to get the camera to work through a physical cover.

brlewis|5 years ago

It would be mildly impressive if a manufacturer made a fake cover with a switch to detect when it's "closed" and make the main camera stream filtered to look like the cover is real, while having a 2nd back-door unfiltered stream. Of course this could be detected by someone who took the unit apart.

gmantg|5 years ago

Just pick a material that's opaque only in visible spectrum.

grogenaut|5 years ago

At this time we specifically bought computers with modules for radios that we could pull. Toshiba was happy to supply this to us.

im3w1l-alt|5 years ago

It's like the halting problem. It's hard to decide whether a given switch works in the general case. But it's possible to design an obviously correct breaker.

Edit: the gnarly thing might be ensuring it doesn't harvest power through data wires or store power in covert capacitors or batteries.

dvfjsdhgfv|5 years ago

I had another laptop with a hardware switch and a corresponding LED, and it worked exactly as it should - the hardware was completely inaccessible under Linux. So yes, it can be done and it's not rocket science.

GuiA|5 years ago

Yes, what you describe is trivial - and it would be similarly trivial to design a module that appears to respect the switch (regardless of Linux/Windows) and yet records things surreptitiously, only to offload it at a later date.

Remember the amount of effort VW was willing to expand to cheat emissions testing.

Angeo34|5 years ago

>tens of thousand of hours >electrical engineering Yea gluing a piece of tape is a piece of art even Marx wasn't able to.

GuiA|5 years ago

The question isn't whether you can add a cover to the product after the fact, it's whether you can trust a switch on a product to do what the manufacturer says it does.