top | item 23880502

(no title)

lps41 | 5 years ago

Yes, but it’s only more efficient than testing everybody if you are unlikely to get a positive result. So, in places where covid is not widely spreading.

discuss

order

lern_too_spel|5 years ago

The method described in the article isn't a traditional pooled test. Each sample is marked, and it tests and reports on all samples at once.