(no title)
so_tired | 5 years ago
I am sympathetic to the "total life time input" argument.
But humans get a hand crafted curriculum inputs, evolved over 1000s of iterations, in a near-optimal language encoding.
Also, if unsupervised gets us in-dist, and DRL seems to be not-bad in search-out-of-dist.... then we are getting close ?
Certainly a x100 scaling of current techniques can get a useful enough machine that makes many human tasks trac-able?
(I am not getting into the Turing / AGI / skynet argument)
No comments yet.