It's always amazing to me how much performance work the basic gnu tools have seen in general. Grep makes some sense, but even yes(1) is fairly carefully tuned; in some cases it actually strikes me as kindof excessive, and not clearly worth the readability drop.
smabie|5 years ago
I tend to fall in the NJ school myself, though I do think Emacs is something special. And though it's derided as slow, Emacs has a ton of super crazy optimizations, especially around rendering.
Pretty much every GNU project written in C is totally unreadable and hopelessly baroque: gcc, glibc, coreutils, etc. For fun, compare some OpenBSD Unix utility implementations with their GNU counterparts. The OpenBSD tools' source code is a joy to read and represents the pinnacle of elegant C. The GNU versions are ugly as sin, but functionally superior in pretty much every way. I don't really agree with how they write code, but you got to respect the almost OCD attention to detail: no edge case goes unhandled.
World's apart from the terse and cavalier style of traditional Unix hackers.
throwaway_pdp09|5 years ago
I can't accept this as a criticism without some elaboration.
> The GNU versions are ugly as sin, but functionally superior in pretty much every way. I don't really agree with how they write code, but you got to respect the almost OCD attention to detail: no edge case goes unhandled.
it sounds like you want the gnu people to stop making software that is 'functionally superior in pretty much every way'.
I don't get what you're saying.
sfoley|5 years ago
https://old.reddit.com/r/unix/comments/6gxduc/how_is_gnu_yes...
milesvp|5 years ago