Do you have any evidence that FireEye’s report is accurate and not misleading? they are the ones that claimed it in the first place.
Also what do you think is more plausible for a western cybersecurity company's bottomline? make Russia innocent or make it guilty? especially when you got the backing of all western governments and media.
FireEye has provided their own evidence[1]. BBC has strong editorial guidelines for dealing with evidence from third-parties[2]. You, however, have provided nothing but conjecture and redirection.
Can you substantiate your claim? If not, it’s fair to classify your comments as obvious attempts to gaslight HN’s readers.
opqpo|5 years ago
Also what do you think is more plausible for a western cybersecurity company's bottomline? make Russia innocent or make it guilty? especially when you got the backing of all western governments and media.
posixplz|5 years ago
Can you substantiate your claim? If not, it’s fair to classify your comments as obvious attempts to gaslight HN’s readers.
1: https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/pdfs/Gh... 2: https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/accurac...
raverbashing|5 years ago