(no title)
treerock | 5 years ago
May be mistaken, but historically didn't socialist view proles as a 'lumpen mass', with no real power?
treerock | 5 years ago
May be mistaken, but historically didn't socialist view proles as a 'lumpen mass', with no real power?
dragonwriter|5 years ago
No, the lumpenproletariat, in Marxist theory is an underclass beneath and contrasted with the proletariat consisting largely of the unemployable (not due to economic system or structure, or physical capacity, but personal character and inclination), career criminals (of more than mala in se than malum prohibiting sense), and the others who neither make nor are inclined to make a positive contribution to society, and which unlike the proletariat is not viewed as a fertile ground for developing class consciousness and is viewed as a dangerous class at best useless to revolutionary organization of the proletariat, and also having a great potential, largely for pay, to individually be recruited as agents by the bourgeoisie against the proletariat.
ivanhoe|5 years ago
[deleted]