(no title)
catalogia | 5 years ago
The data I've found is:
Under 1: 15 deaths
1-4: 10 deaths
5-14: 20 deaths
15-24: 225 deaths
The curve continues from there, peaking at 45,845 for 85 years or older. So yes, some kids do die, or at least they had covid when they died. But if this were all covid was, we certainly wouldn't have closed schools for the kids' sake over this. Clearly schools are closed due to the threat posed to teachers.https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Death-Counts-...
shadowgovt|5 years ago
I'm hoping that's not the dominant factor in the numbers, because school re-opening will be real ugly if it is.
em500|5 years ago
In the Netherlands, 0.6% of the reported hospitalisations involved children under the age of 18, and 0 death have been reported under this age. Here's the summary page of the RIVM: https://www.rivm.nl/en/novel-coronavirus-covid-19/children-a...
Some googling reveals only corroborating reports that the case fatality (CFR) rate among young children is very low:
https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/sites/know4pol/files/j...
https://ourworldindata.org/mortality-risk-covid#case-fatalit...
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/ep...
AFAICT if you just try to synthesize the existing research without prejudice, you'd have to conclude that the risk of young children dying from COVID-19 is very low.
Whether there is much risk of children -> adult transmission is more difficult to answer.
catalogia|5 years ago
That might be true to a degree, however the discrepancy is so huge, 2-3 orders of magnitude, that it should be pretty clear kids really do have much less to fear. I think some Olympic-level contortionism is needed to come to any other conclusion.