top | item 24083639

(no title)

catalogia | 5 years ago

Why do you think that? If those companies are hobbled, that will give any EU competitor to them some breathing room.

discuss

order

zepto|5 years ago

Yeah - I’m aware of this way of thinking.

If the goal is to simply clone google or Facebook in Europe for reasons of politics then I agree - hobbling them would facilitate that.

If the goal is to actually produce something better, I think the opposite is true.

If you hobble them through protectionism, you create a vacuum which will be filled by a clone.

The clone will then have the same incentives to preserve the status quo as Google and Facebook are doing, just with different ownership.

The only way to replace Google and Facebook with something better is to identify and invest in something better - I.e. something that offers value that they can’t.

I do believe that government investment, can help with this.

I also believe that consumer rights laws etc can help.

catalogia|5 years ago

> If the goal is to simply clone google or Facebook in Europe for reasons of politics then I agree - hobbling them would facilitate that. If the goal is to actually produce something better, I think the opposite is true.

I think the result would be inherently "actually" superior by virtue of being under the thumb of EU regulation to a degree that American corporations aren't. I'm not talking about technical superiority, which I don't care about. Having locally regulated technically inferior clones is preferable to the status quo.

> I also believe that consumer rights laws etc can help.

And such laws are best enforced against local companies, not foreign companies with foreign values. That's why it's a good idea for the EU to hobble, if not outright ban, American internet companies.