(no title)
mirimir | 5 years ago
It's a great article, and I know that I'm being pedantic, but chemical explosions need not involve oxygen. For example, consider acetylene and silver acetylide, with a carbon-carbon triple bond. Or lead azide, with a nitrogen-nitrogen triple bond.
AmericanChopper|5 years ago
They do need an oxidiser though. Which may or may not involve oxygen. You’re right of course, but redox itself has some poorly chosen jargon.
mirimir|5 years ago
When lead azide detonates, you get elemental lead and diatomic nitrogen. So yes, the Pb++ oxidizes the azide.
When acetylene detonates, you get a mixture of organic compounds. But I don't believe that there's any redox involved. You just get various hydrocarbons with single and double carbon-carbon bonds. And just to be clear, this is when there's no oxidizing agent present.
TheSpiceIsLife|5 years ago
The jargon being that an oxidiser is an substance that can accept electrons, and doesn't have to by oxygen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidizing_agent
mnw21cam|5 years ago
mirimir|5 years ago