Have you thought about an upgraded service to have you review students data manually? Customers might pay a premium to have a human look at it so they don't have to choose between looking at it themselves and trusting your AI.
Good point. There are other proctoring services that offer a human proctor. So, at one level, we would be competing with them.
But, more importantly, we tell our teachers that they should think of AutoProctor as more of a preventive tool. Just knowing that they are being monitored means that students are much less likely to cheat. Teachers tell us that student grades have dropped significantly since they started using AutoProctor. So, at least as of now, it seems to be working.
Another area we would have to worry about with a human reviewing the evidence is the Privacy. For now, only the algorithm and the kid's teachers have access to the data. Opening it up to third-party contractors would mean having to deal with all the issues that brings along.
jayanthtn|5 years ago
But, more importantly, we tell our teachers that they should think of AutoProctor as more of a preventive tool. Just knowing that they are being monitored means that students are much less likely to cheat. Teachers tell us that student grades have dropped significantly since they started using AutoProctor. So, at least as of now, it seems to be working.
Another area we would have to worry about with a human reviewing the evidence is the Privacy. For now, only the algorithm and the kid's teachers have access to the data. Opening it up to third-party contractors would mean having to deal with all the issues that brings along.