I think you left the interviewers some bad impressions about your technical skills.
Blame the interviewers throw easy questions at you and think that it's all they get is blatantly wrong. Most Microsoft's devs are better than that!
Based on my experience, the fact that you did not get harder questions show that they thought you did not sail through the easy ones as they expected. And believe me, knowing the answer is one thing, explaining it clearly is another thing.
When I interviewed in Redmond last year, I got 5 interviews total. The first one is easy with all similar questions you got. The second was harder as the guy asked me a problem that starts off easy but when you add more data to it, it becomes more like an open problem. The third one is a OOP design question. The fourth one I met an engineer that joined MS from 1992 and he asked me only one algorithmic question that I have never seen before (Believe me, I read all those 'interviews' books and I know many ). It was very strange tree structure that I did not remember. I spent about 20 minutes stared at it and I got the first part after 35 minutes and then he asked me to explain how I finish the problem. He seemed to be OK with my answer. The last interviewer is a manager. He did not ask me anymore technical question but focus mostly on my preferences, experiences, previous jobs and some behavioral questions.
I think the interviews are on par with other top companies like Google ( but Google focus much more on scale ), Facebook and Amazon ( focus more on design and scale ).
In conclusion, rest assure that your interviewers are much smarter than you think. Hope you do better next time!
I'm absolutely positive that Microsoft Devs and Testers are top notch. That's why I wanted to work there and why I was sad about the result of the interview.
It was not me that didn't get harder questions. The other 3 that were interviewing at the same time said exactly the same thing (they gave the same problems to everyone). In each interview, with the exception of the second one that I solved two coding problems, I was asked a lot of behavioral questions before like 10minutes of the end, where I have to code.
Reminds me of mine at MS over a decade ago. Breezed through the first two and I was starting to think I had this nailed. In the third one they took me to this older guy's office and he sat in this weird contraption looking chair. Details are fuzzy maybe because it was perhaps the most traumatic interview I've ever had. He dived right into Windows Kernel and I knew I was in trouble 5 minutes into the interview. They sent me back to my hotel after that one and I knew I was done for. A week later the rejection came by mail. Anyway overall good experience except for those harrowing 45 minutes.
In my experience, Microsoft interviews tend to build off of each other. You start off with a fairly simple interview, and the things you mess up (or that the interviewer didn't feel you were especially strong on) are the things they probe deeper on further into the interview. I'm not at all surprised that you felt it was pretty easy if you only met with 3 interviewers, considering a full loop is ~6 real interviews with a fluff interview at the end if you've 'passed'.
"Are you fucking serious? Probably HR persons do not know what a compiler is"
This is actually common. You're right, the HR person wouldn't know what a compiler is, she is following a script with admissible answers to the problems and just listening for keywords that show you have the bare knowledge to pass the screening interview.
From the tone of your comments about the interview, it sounds like you seemed shocked at some questions, thought they were simplistic, etc. and probably let this show. This, I think, was the biggest factor why you didn't get it. Many interviewers have no idea how to interview, and they ask pet questions culled from online sources and friends. If they get the idea that you find some question simple or "beneath you" they take it personally.
So, lesson for next time: React to all interviewer questions equally and control your frustration.
I understand your point. But, for instance, the first interviewer said : "if you've already solved this problem, please say it and we change it". I think I didn't do anything bad when I said it was pretty common and the solutions are X and Y... I'll not lie and say that's the first time I have to code a solution to reverse words in a String and dealt with it like it's an NP Problem...
Surprising that they gave such detailed feedback. That's usually a big no-no. And for a good reason as we can see here. If the candidate disagrees with the feedback, he will get angry. But good luck with the search.
I interviewed with one of the bigger org's at MS in Seattle about a month ago, they told us that they would be unable to give us feedback if we didn't receive an offer. I suppose different branches of MS could do things different?
Fortunately I didn't have to worry about that, starting this summer :)
Depends I guess. I really appreciated the comments that I receive after getting rejected by a startup funder. And while the OP is not happy, he at least provides constructive criticism to the process.
I get the impression that you weren't really interested in working at Microsoft. I personally wouldn't bother working there, mostly because I would have to program in Windows. I think if you got hired there you would probably less happy than you are today. Getting stuck working at a company you despise is one of the worst things you can do to yourself.
It sounds like they may have thought you struggled more on the reverse list of strings question than you thought you did. I think its something they expected you to just crank out.
With that said, implementing a heap with two stacks seems pretty good. That's something that certainly doesn't just jump to the front of my mind at all.
I wonder if the green usernames may actually help posts by new users gain traction. I found myself more likely to take a look--curious to see what sort of submissions new users are offering.
both accounts are very recent. so i suspect (see my other comment) that new users are "green" and that this post is spam that is being pumped by a sockpuppet (posted by a green user with, initially, a single reply from another green user). nice :o)
[+] [-] biobot|15 years ago|reply
Blame the interviewers throw easy questions at you and think that it's all they get is blatantly wrong. Most Microsoft's devs are better than that!
Based on my experience, the fact that you did not get harder questions show that they thought you did not sail through the easy ones as they expected. And believe me, knowing the answer is one thing, explaining it clearly is another thing.
When I interviewed in Redmond last year, I got 5 interviews total. The first one is easy with all similar questions you got. The second was harder as the guy asked me a problem that starts off easy but when you add more data to it, it becomes more like an open problem. The third one is a OOP design question. The fourth one I met an engineer that joined MS from 1992 and he asked me only one algorithmic question that I have never seen before (Believe me, I read all those 'interviews' books and I know many ). It was very strange tree structure that I did not remember. I spent about 20 minutes stared at it and I got the first part after 35 minutes and then he asked me to explain how I finish the problem. He seemed to be OK with my answer. The last interviewer is a manager. He did not ask me anymore technical question but focus mostly on my preferences, experiences, previous jobs and some behavioral questions.
I think the interviews are on par with other top companies like Google ( but Google focus much more on scale ), Facebook and Amazon ( focus more on design and scale ).
In conclusion, rest assure that your interviewers are much smarter than you think. Hope you do better next time!
[+] [-] matheusalmeida|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] renegadedev|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ctide|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Jun8|15 years ago|reply
This is actually common. You're right, the HR person wouldn't know what a compiler is, she is following a script with admissible answers to the problems and just listening for keywords that show you have the bare knowledge to pass the screening interview.
From the tone of your comments about the interview, it sounds like you seemed shocked at some questions, thought they were simplistic, etc. and probably let this show. This, I think, was the biggest factor why you didn't get it. Many interviewers have no idea how to interview, and they ask pet questions culled from online sources and friends. If they get the idea that you find some question simple or "beneath you" they take it personally.
So, lesson for next time: React to all interviewer questions equally and control your frustration.
[+] [-] matheusalmeida|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jsnell|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bjg|15 years ago|reply
Fortunately I didn't have to worry about that, starting this summer :)
[+] [-] jamesteow|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sbochins|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kenjackson|15 years ago|reply
With that said, implementing a heap with two stacks seems pretty good. That's something that certainly doesn't just jump to the front of my mind at all.
You'll do fine. You seem like a bright kid.
[+] [-] px|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] josefresco|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andrewcooke|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] somersault_07|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andrewcooke|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] matheusalmeida|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] holdupadam|15 years ago|reply