(no title)
stx | 5 years ago
When I was in Mexico around the early 2000 they still did this. When you buy a drink you could return it for a few cents back from the vender.
stx | 5 years ago
When I was in Mexico around the early 2000 they still did this. When you buy a drink you could return it for a few cents back from the vender.
mattmanser|5 years ago
Stop blaming consumers for corporate choices to slightly increase profits.
Like in the UK, Tesco have just inexplicably switched from using cardboard egg containers to plastic ones. Is that my fault?
gambiting|5 years ago
bostik|5 years ago
If you keep buying them, yes. Tesco's beancounters (who are legion) are certainly going to keep track of the overall cost and revenue structure. Assuming the plastic containers cost less and are sold in equal amounts, they will push forward to roll out plastic over cardboard where they can.
If they want price signals, give them price signals. Vote with your wallet.
We buy our eggs from a nearby farm. Tray of 30 is good for a week, and sometimes two. Better quality than what Tesco or Sainsbury's offers, too.
EDIT: we also return our cardboard trays to the farm shop when we buy a new batch. Reuse >> recycle.
matthewheath|5 years ago
They've only switched because they've run out of the pulp used to make the cardboard egg containers. It's a temporary switch, although not ideal.
petre|5 years ago
jasonwatkinspdx|5 years ago
At the end of the day, if we want companies to do more sustainable things than using single use packages that cost nearly nothing to dump in a landfill (or litter), then we need to start charging them enough to incentive sustainable behavior. And sadly few politicians want to be the person that raises prices on bottles of milk or racks of beer.
Steltek|5 years ago
Generally speaking, our recycling outweighs our trash and (commercial) compost put together. Mostly the bottle deposit doesn't change my recycling or purchasing behavior and it only annoys me that I'm "throwing money away". I think the biggest reason to keep it is because it's a perverted form of social welfare for homeless trash pickers who have a different tradeoff of time for money than myself.
rhacker|5 years ago
refurb|5 years ago
Better to haul a trailer full of coke that 98% product and 2% plastic than one that’s 90% product and 10% glass.
Scoundreller|5 years ago
brianwawok|5 years ago
mythrwy|5 years ago
The procedure was open the soda bottle, pour the soda into a plastic bag, put a straw in the bag and tie it. The vendor kept the bottle (presumably you could keep the bottle yourself if you paid the deposit with your soda). I kept waiting to see a bag leak or some other disaster but it seemed to mostly work. You couldn't put your soda down though. Maybe it was a scheme to encourage rapid consumption or accidental loss and sell more sodas, not sure.
ad_hominem|5 years ago
If some guy used his bottle as a hammer for several months before turning it in for recycling, then someone cuts their hand on a jagged edge or drinks a glass sliver, that's a multi-million dollar lawsuit. Unlikely maybe but at Coca-Cola scale I imagine things like that will happen eventually.
These companies would have to have sophisticated QA processes, or melt down and re-cast the bottles to ensure the food safety of their supply chain against millions of chaos monkeys.
Edit: Here I just did a Google search for the butthurt downvoters that proves there is extra QA that needs to be done. From an Oregon glass bottling reuse program:[1]
> Among other attributes, the machinery features an electronic sensor that uses X-ray equipment to image each bottle, detecting flaws in the glass, as well as mold and other contaminants, Bailey said. That step will reject any bottles that are chipped or contaminated.
[1]: https://resource-recycling.com/recycling/2018/03/13/oregon-e...
kevin_b_er|5 years ago
You base laws that protect the well being of the citizenry into a tort reform call. Protecting corporations that abuse the public does not improve the lives of the public. It just improves the profit margin.
The basis of "tort reform" is a panic assessment that lawsuits run wild and the only solution is to indemnify the rich and powerful. This lets them abuse the public even more.
Your link implies this is for liability, but it could just as easily be a filtering step so that the bottles provided are up to a certain quality standard to be readily reused.
The root problem is the bottles are cheaper to make out of disposable material. The cost burden is shifted to The People over a longer term. This is the tragedy of the commons.
blacksmith_tb|5 years ago