(no title)
112012123 | 5 years ago
Last time I spoke with a widebody broker a few months ago, an old 747 with no equipment was a smidge less than $100k. Though with COVID, airworthy 747 freighters are 30-50 million....
112012123 | 5 years ago
Last time I spoke with a widebody broker a few months ago, an old 747 with no equipment was a smidge less than $100k. Though with COVID, airworthy 747 freighters are 30-50 million....
ineedasername|5 years ago
throwawaysea|5 years ago
nathan_f77|5 years ago
Here's another person living in a 727: https://www.youtube.com/watch/?v=rKm5oF2p-II
This one has a much nicer interior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdwLlI9abgU
According to one of the comments on the first video, they spent 120k on the plane, and another 100k to move it to the forest. I would probably want to spend another ~300k for renovations and everything else (proper foundation, shower, kitchen, water and sewer lines, etc. etc.)
It's not cheap, but that's a lot cheaper than I was expecting. Especially compared to the average house in an expensive city. I think it might also be a lot more fun than living in a "tiny house".
I recently read this "Why We Don't Like Our Underground House" article that was posted on HN: https://dengarden.com/misc/The-Pitfalls-of-an-Underground-Ho... That was a reminder that doing something unconventional can be risky and cause lots of unexpected problems. So it would probably be a good idea to also spend a lot of money on architects and engineers to make sure that everything is done properly and there's no surprises.
throwaway0a5e|5 years ago
$120k on the plane. $5k to move it into the forest. $95k fee for not having friends with heavy equipment. $200k for making somebody else do the renovating for you. $50k on materials. $50k on markup.
Neither the weight nor size of the plane are astronomical. The square footage to renovate isn't that high either. The reason it costs so much is that it's odd and every time you pay someone else there's a huge cost associated with a one-off and everything about the project is one-off.
briffle|5 years ago
Of course, it's next door to, and both started by the guy who ran the now defunct evergreen aviation.
bleepblorp|5 years ago
Obviously, the fact that it has been done means that it is legally possible in some jurisdictions, but it's likely to be an uphill battle--or completely impossible--elsewhere.
Communities that require newly constructed buildings to match the character of the neighborhood likely would never grant permission for an airliner house. Jurisdictions that don't have this requirement would still require building code compliance, which could be extremely difficult to achieve as the technical standards used in aviation are not comparable to those used in conventional construction or mobile homes. At minimum, you'd have major issues with insulation requirements, fire resistance, and emergency egress.
After all of this, you'd still need to find a bank willing to issue a construction loan/mortgage, and an insurer willing to cover the finished product.
$300K might be a very low-end estimate of the costs involved to make everything physically and legally proper.
xienze|5 years ago
Seems like quite a bit to live in a 747 in the middle of nowhere. Why not just buy an already-built $500K house in the middle of nowhere? It would be bigger and save you a whole lot of hassle.
microtonal|5 years ago
I got quite nervous as the plane appears to be resting on a pile of wood pellets.
AdrianB1|5 years ago
redis_mlc|5 years ago
Airliners are merely business tools - operators have no romance for any plane.
If a 777 is even 2% more efficient than a 747, the 747 is grounded and chopped up.
The related factors are that 4 engines is more maintenance than 2 engines, the classic 747 is no longer certified for passenger use in the USA (wiring and fuel-tank inerting ADs), and ETOPS allows twin-engine flight on almost all commercially-viable oceanic routes. (ETOPS makes me nervous af.)
Source: commercially-rated airplane pilot.
eloff|5 years ago
tyingq|5 years ago
nathan_f77|5 years ago
One of the people also talked about turning a second one into an AirBnb, so I think that's a great idea. It would be a very unique place to stay, so I think it would be fully booked if you're in a decent location.
k_sze|5 years ago
MichaelZuo|5 years ago
112012123|5 years ago
But if you're curious re:prices, you can call the dealer listed on Controller.com as selling a 777. He's actually got several for sale in that neighborhood (and is super friendly, too - Eric).
tyingq|5 years ago
stanfordkid|5 years ago
Apparently the airplane itself was free, but it cost $250k to transport it to the location of filming!
lostlogin|5 years ago
tus88|5 years ago