(no title)
davegardner | 5 years ago
In summary, FutureFeed is working with several external suppliers to establish production. They expect to be able to improve the crop production over time.
One thing of note is significant reductions can be achieved with quite a low ratio of seaweed in the feed. Specifically they report that recent feedlot trials demonstrated over 95% methane reduction with seaweed inclusion at 0.20% of OM in the ration.
leipert|5 years ago
I would still argue that we should look into reducing our consumption, as other environmental impacts like water consumption are still considerable. Anyhow: A step in the right direction!
wodenokoto|5 years ago
Those numbers do not show that we are reducing the output of methane by reducing the input of methane, but that the process itself is generating less methane from basically the same input.
twic|5 years ago
The other small molecules in question seem to be what are called "volatile fatty acids" (VFAs), which i think are more or less the same as "short-chain fatty acids" [0], and they're good for the animal.
Acetate and propionate are two main VFAs. A study on sheep [1] found that "Sheep fed Asparagopsis had a significantly lower concentration of total volatile fatty acids and acetate, but a higher propionate concentration.". If there's less methane and also less VFAs, then i assume less cellulose is being broken down. But more of the carbon from it is going into VFAs.
It would be good to have a study like this in cows.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-chain_fatty_acid
[1] https://www.publish.csiro.au/an/an15883