top | item 24638007

(no title)

tossAfterUsing | 5 years ago

> When we have had presidents who were willing to condemn white supremacy, we tended not to call on CEOs to.

https://twitter.com/robsmithonline/status/131113297546835968...

discuss

order

paulgb|5 years ago

Last night he was given the chance to unequivocally condemn the Proud Boys and instead told them to "stand back and stand by", which the group themselves has taken as a rally cry. Just like how after Charlottesville, white supremacists took his ambiguous response as a sign of approval.

He doesn't condemn, he validates with just enough deniability that people can make lists like the one you posted, while everyone who is following along sees exactly what is happening.

itsoktocry|5 years ago

>Last night he was given the chance to unequivocally condemn the Proud Boys and instead told them to "stand back and stand by

Let's be honest here: if Trump had "unequivocally" said "I condemn White Supremacy", what would have happened, practically? Do you think for a second that the media would have suddenly "let him off the hook"? Problem solved? No more white supremacy talk?

There is footage of him disavowing the KKK, and David Duke, going back 20 years, believe it or not. Has it made a difference?

The fact that question was even asked demonstrates just how far the US political system has fallen. Kind of embarrassing. The fact that Trump doesn't simply repeat the condemnation -- for whatever that's worth -- is sad and polarizing. But let's not pretend it changes anyone's opinion on anything.

>He doesn't condemn, he validates with just enough deniability

Much like many Democrats did with regards to the looting and burning of cities.

skinkestek|5 years ago

Did you follow that debate closely? Because it seems like a lot more nuanced than the media put it.