top | item 24713548 (no title) throwaway373438 | 5 years ago It sounds like the original analogy is apt, and your followup analogy isn't. discuss order hn newest mehrdadn|5 years ago I wasn't the one who compared this with the width of a car and then got confused what a shorter width would even mean.But sure, if you say so. throwaway373438|5 years ago Program identifiers use exact matches. The analogy works fine understanding this context.It's possible to extend any analogy in a way that doesn't make sense, which is what you've done.It seems like your complaint may be that you simply don't like, or perhaps don't understand, analogies in general.
mehrdadn|5 years ago I wasn't the one who compared this with the width of a car and then got confused what a shorter width would even mean.But sure, if you say so. throwaway373438|5 years ago Program identifiers use exact matches. The analogy works fine understanding this context.It's possible to extend any analogy in a way that doesn't make sense, which is what you've done.It seems like your complaint may be that you simply don't like, or perhaps don't understand, analogies in general.
throwaway373438|5 years ago Program identifiers use exact matches. The analogy works fine understanding this context.It's possible to extend any analogy in a way that doesn't make sense, which is what you've done.It seems like your complaint may be that you simply don't like, or perhaps don't understand, analogies in general.
mehrdadn|5 years ago
But sure, if you say so.
throwaway373438|5 years ago
It's possible to extend any analogy in a way that doesn't make sense, which is what you've done.
It seems like your complaint may be that you simply don't like, or perhaps don't understand, analogies in general.