Nothing like publishing a textual data table as a giant picture.
"If this data doesn’t get you off the couch and coding the next great product, I don’t know what will." If the hope of a 9 digit payoff is what's motivating you to start a company, you're better off trying your luck on a roulette wheel.
Ah, the repeated companies had me confused for a moment, too! The list is partitioned by { company, founder } (note the different ownership percentages), which is why some companies appear multiple times.
> ” If this data doesn’t get you off the couch and coding the next great product, I don’t know what will.”
Well, that’s a severe lack of imagination by the author. I can think of lots of reasons to start coding a new project that are not how much a few dozen of people earned in an IPO.
"mm" is a perversion of "MM", which is derived from Roman numerals (M is 1000, and MM is M*M). This notation has a long history of use in business and accounting.
For consistency, the author's use of "bln" should be "BB", or at least "B". These have no Roman antecedents, but they are common in accounting.
I've never seen "MMM" for billion. Missed opportunity! I'll have to suggest that to our CFO for our next filing.
What a gross overstep by Spotify. Over $9B combined between the two founders!?! Meanwhile bands are struggling to make it through the pandemic. Guess I'll be deleting my Spotify account. Barf.
NelsonMinar|5 years ago
"If this data doesn’t get you off the couch and coding the next great product, I don’t know what will." If the hope of a 9 digit payoff is what's motivating you to start a company, you're better off trying your luck on a roulette wheel.
xibalba|5 years ago
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
GeneralTspoon|5 years ago
Plus the tone of the article makes it seem like a quick marketing piece to try and advertise their VC fund.
PNWChris|5 years ago
soneca|5 years ago
Well, that’s a severe lack of imagination by the author. I can think of lots of reasons to start coding a new project that are not how much a few dozen of people earned in an IPO.
danaugrs|5 years ago
Additionally sometimes the founder's name is right in one row but not in the other e.g. Cloudflare's Matthew Prince (right) vs Matthew Price (wrong).
Not a good look.
sreekotay|5 years ago
seattle_spring|5 years ago
fatnoah|5 years ago
It also self-selects for "major" offerings as well. I'd be curious to see this table for ALL tech IPOs.
sk5t|5 years ago
new_realist|5 years ago
aqme28|5 years ago
It claims an "average" from this list while intentionally neglecting less-successful IPOs and downright failures.
Also, I'd be curious to see what the exits are after the 3-6 month lockup period. Some startups IPO decently, but then tank.
jacquesm|5 years ago
m4tthumphrey|5 years ago
yellowstuff|5 years ago
Therefore "mm" is the most unambiguous way to denote millions, and is used in accounting.
stingraycharles|5 years ago
quesera|5 years ago
For consistency, the author's use of "bln" should be "BB", or at least "B". These have no Roman antecedents, but they are common in accounting.
I've never seen "MMM" for billion. Missed opportunity! I'll have to suggest that to our CFO for our next filing.
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
josh_carterPDX|5 years ago
rashthedude|5 years ago