Curiously, most of the historians from the west blatantly ignore significant contributions from the other part of the world's, for their own versions of biased history. They just conveniently sweep the other people contributions as their era of dark ages. The dark ages are for them and not for other part of the worlds.
This Brief History of Surgeons article is another proof of this biased narrative. The five volumes of The Canon of Medicine book by Ibnu Sina (Avicenna) was used as one of the main reference textbooks throughout Europe including Oxford and Cambridge University for several hundred years until 18th century [1]. It also has significant original contents on surgery that were based on the work of Galen and extend them [2]. If you think the title is familiar it is because the English word "Canon" is derived from the title of this book, in a similar fashion that the word "Algebra" is derived from the title of another book by Al-Khwarizmi.
There are many other significant medical works from Middle Eastern scholars on the subject of surgery since they are the pioneers of modern university based hospitals that are common in the world today.
Eurocentric biases are dominate across various academic disciplines. they either deny the attribution to our culture or call it plain superstitious belief.
enlightening article on devastating effect of it by śri lankan biologist:
then the onus of proof lies with us to prove suśruta was indeed a great surgeon, whereas we never see Europeans giving evidence to establish that Euclid was a real man.
Following book by prof. CK Raju on Euclid is a worthy read for anyone who wish to learn how Academic Imperialism works to perpetuate the aforementioned biases.
Euclid and Jesus: How and why the church changed mathematics and Christianity across two religious wars
I'll use this space to recommend a podcast called Sawbones which is hosted by Sydnee and Justin McElroy. Justin might be familiar to some podcast listeners as a host of My Brother My Brother and Me or Adventure Zone while Sydnee is an MD.
They go through medical topics each week and a big portion of the episodes is Sydnee recounting the medical history of whatever their topic is, often citing Greek or Egyptian origins of disease or related treatments; I always find that portion of the show fascinating.
Wonderful article, and reminds me of "The Butchering Art" by Lindsey Fitzharris. Truly eye-opening as to how recently surgery became a viable treatment, and how much determination (and dumb luck) it took to get us here.
For me this book was very important https://www.librarything.com/work/4357208
It opened my eyes how bad was the hygiene and how much time it took to realize doctors that they have to wash hands!
[+] [-] sachdevap|5 years ago|reply
The Sushruta-Samhita covers hernia surgery, C-sections, prostrate removal ... a huge range of topics.
[+] [-] teleforce|5 years ago|reply
This Brief History of Surgeons article is another proof of this biased narrative. The five volumes of The Canon of Medicine book by Ibnu Sina (Avicenna) was used as one of the main reference textbooks throughout Europe including Oxford and Cambridge University for several hundred years until 18th century [1]. It also has significant original contents on surgery that were based on the work of Galen and extend them [2]. If you think the title is familiar it is because the English word "Canon" is derived from the title of this book, in a similar fashion that the word "Algebra" is derived from the title of another book by Al-Khwarizmi.
There are many other significant medical works from Middle Eastern scholars on the subject of surgery since they are the pioneers of modern university based hospitals that are common in the world today.
[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Canon_of_Medicine
[2]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32013741/
[+] [-] aq3cn|5 years ago|reply
enlightening article on devastating effect of it by śri lankan biologist:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-of-co...
then the onus of proof lies with us to prove suśruta was indeed a great surgeon, whereas we never see Europeans giving evidence to establish that Euclid was a real man.
Following book by prof. CK Raju on Euclid is a worthy read for anyone who wish to learn how Academic Imperialism works to perpetuate the aforementioned biases.
Euclid and Jesus: How and why the church changed mathematics and Christianity across two religious wars
http://ckraju.net/Euclid/
https://www.amazon.com/Euclid-Jesus-mathematics-Christianity...
please do explore other work of prof. Rāju.
[+] [-] TheCapn|5 years ago|reply
They go through medical topics each week and a big portion of the episodes is Sydnee recounting the medical history of whatever their topic is, often citing Greek or Egyptian origins of disease or related treatments; I always find that portion of the show fascinating.
[+] [-] paperwasp42|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gitowiec|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bobowzki|5 years ago|reply