top | item 25013571

(no title)

taxicab | 5 years ago

This is the third time this conspiracy theory has been submitted here. Knock it off.

discuss

order

sergioro|5 years ago

Please tell us why this is a conspiracy theory. The article has references to the data sources, including web-archived snapshots of official government websites.

maxharris|5 years ago

If you are downvoting me, I would appreciate it if you simply read my comment all the way through before doing it. I am not your enemy, nor am I yours. I would appreciate it if you’d be just a little kinder.

taxicab|5 years ago

It's not possible to downvote immediate replies on HN.

maxharris|5 years ago

The thing about Benford’s law isn’t a conspiracy theory. It isn’t evidence necessarily proving fraud, either, but it is an important finding that warrants further investigation. I don’t know what will come of this, but I do know that it will be written about at length in the coming court battle. I didn’t vote for Trump, btw...

taxicab|5 years ago

No. This baseless insistance that the most closely watched election in living history has had fraud at a scale never seen in the US that occurred in front of hundreds of bipartisan observers is literally a conspiracy theory.

All of the newly minted statistics experts on the internet wildly missaplying methods to support their foregone conclusions are exactly the same as Johny C. Theorist getting an internet education in materials science so that he can understand for himself that jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams. Trump's polling numbers also don't follow Benford's law in some cases. That's because there is no direct causation between legitimate elections and a Benford's law style distribution.

The fixation on wildly cherry picked data and missaplied statistics is the conspiracy theory. There are already court cases with the best experts in the land looking at the counts. Guess what? They are starting to be laughed out of court because they have no evidence to support their claims. It is either supremely arrogant or delusional to claim that you have found this thing that you spent five minutes learning about on the internet that proves magically that the Democrats stole the election while world renowned experts aren't able to prove it to a judge.

There is no liberal conspiracy to steal an election. Trump made the same claim in 2016. He made it during the Republican primaries about his opponents (that they cheated him). He said the system was rigged when he settled the fraud lawsuite for trump university. Hell... he even said he was being cheated when his tv show wasn't awarded an Emmy. This is just what he does and instead of spreading lies he needs to accept that he lost (probably... we'll see soon) and stop dividing the country.