(no title)
kenperkins | 5 years ago
I can't even imagine the maintenance or repair considerations of a pack that's embedded inside of the frame or a monocoque chassis.
Lastly this isn't even an Ars article, it's from Wired. It really is a terrible click-bait headline. The article, imho isn't much better.
ethbr0|5 years ago
It's terrible for repairability, and with regards to power sources... safety.
This is a bunch of researchers solving the wrong optimization problem. You'll likely see it in Formula E, but under no circumstances should it be in production, mass-produced cars.
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_25
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_MP4/1
toomuchtodo|5 years ago
https://cleantechnica.com/2020/10/10/teslas-new-structural-b... (Tesla’s New Structural Battery Pack — It’s Not Cell-to-Pack, It’s Cell-to-Body)
freshpots|5 years ago
Qwertious|5 years ago
What OP's link is describing, is where the battery cells literally are the vehicle trunk - as in they're built into the walls, instead of being contained between two walls.
unknown|5 years ago
[deleted]
jjulius|5 years ago
Yes they do. The first paragraph of this article discusses Elon Musk talking about integrating this into Teslas.
phkahler|5 years ago
marshray|5 years ago
colinmcdermott|5 years ago
Gizmodo stylee