I've heard teams have won hackathons with 0 lines of code, which makes sense to me. Biz model+mockups+presentation (and if it seems technologically feasible) should beat the neatest app.
They’re also “removing” anyone who has replied all
It's TC's event and they can do whatever they want.
If TC sends a reply all, it's an honest mistake.
If you do it, you get removed from the list. Because they can.
I learned a valuable lesson today ... never give out my true email address to ANYONE! :p But seriously ... do people routinely create aliases for every form they submit on the net? In this case, I had an expectation of privacy. Feeling really screwed now :(
You are feeling screwed? Because it was disclosed you entered a competition? What were you going to do if you got in, wear a balaclava and talk through some sort of voice altering device to hide your true voice?
And if you don't get in are you afraid that people are going to ridicule you for the rest of your life because your name was in the to list with 500 people?
I appreciate that TC made a mistake, and you would think they might have gone a bit further in preventing this sort of mistake, but I think we have all suffered far worse invasions of privacy than this (half the people on the list probably tweeted that they'd entered anyway).
I do - my personal email (I have my own domain) is only given out to personal friends and with the explicit instruction that they better not use it to sign up to competitions or 'tell a friend / share the reward' forms. Some still do of course, but at least gmail's spam filter filters out most of the junk.
For any 'commercial' site or correspondence, I create a unique alias. Well 'create' is too formal, I simply have a catch-all address so I can create 'aliases' on the spur of the moment. I rely on gmail's spam filter to filter out the rubbish and if a particular alias becomes 'compromised', I can create a custom rule that deletes email received at that particular alias.
[+] [-] stretchwithme|15 years ago|reply
And just add another message for every order of magnitude increase in the number of recipients.
[+] [-] awa|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jrockway|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johns|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmor|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mahmud|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mkeblx|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prpon|15 years ago|reply
It's TC's event and they can do whatever they want. If TC sends a reply all, it's an honest mistake. If you do it, you get removed from the list. Because they can.
[+] [-] edanm|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JCB_K|15 years ago|reply
that's brilliant!
[+] [-] iqster|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DirtyAndy|15 years ago|reply
And if you don't get in are you afraid that people are going to ridicule you for the rest of your life because your name was in the to list with 500 people?
I appreciate that TC made a mistake, and you would think they might have gone a bit further in preventing this sort of mistake, but I think we have all suffered far worse invasions of privacy than this (half the people on the list probably tweeted that they'd entered anyway).
[+] [-] tobtoh|15 years ago|reply
For any 'commercial' site or correspondence, I create a unique alias. Well 'create' is too formal, I simply have a catch-all address so I can create 'aliases' on the spur of the moment. I rely on gmail's spam filter to filter out the rubbish and if a particular alias becomes 'compromised', I can create a custom rule that deletes email received at that particular alias.
[+] [-] commanda|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] karamazov|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] devindotcom|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] EGreg|15 years ago|reply
Thank You, TechCrunch Disupt
HAHA THIS IS FUNNY (update: it's not TC disrupt writing it)
[+] [-] vipivip|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dotBen|15 years ago|reply