top | item 25149532

(no title)

hashtagmarkup | 5 years ago

THE PEOPLE WHO RELEASED THE DKIM KEYS WOULD BE GUILTY, YOU COMPLETE DOLT.

I didn't claim a crime was committed... you did, you complete dolt.

Evidence doesn't imply a crime... you complete dolt.

If someone peed in a cup to get tested for evidence of something, and someone else peed in the same cup... that evidence was destroyed. It can no longer be tested to form any conclusions. The potential for evidence was destroyed. no crime was committed.

You might be the least bright person on earth.

You complete dolt.

discuss

order

dang|5 years ago

Yikes! Posting like this (and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25133743) will get you banned on HN. We're trying for the other end of the swimming pool here. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site to heart, we'd be grateful.

Edit: comments like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25066116 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25118713 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25067189 also break the site guidelines quite badly.

Would you mind taking a look at this explanation I posted a couple days ago? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25130956 It is my attempt to explain why we don't want users to flame each other here, even when the other person is ignorant or wrong. The reason may be different than you think, in which case perhaps it will have some persuasive power for you. I hope so anyhow.

hashtagmarkup|5 years ago

You're absolutely right... the other person was ignorant and wrong.