top | item 25156134 (no title) pdmfz | 5 years ago Agreed but what is noticeable is how much greater the losses are this year (with still three months to go).2018: $97.2m2019: $86.0m2020: $203.2m discuss order hn newest rdlecler1|5 years ago If LTV >> CaC then spend. disgruntledphd2|5 years ago Assuming your LTV calculations are correct, then this will work out.LTV models are really, really hard to get right though, and I've seen a bunch of startups go bust because of getting this wrong. load replies (1) darkwizard42|5 years ago While in a vacuum larger losses aren't painting the full picture, but then if you take their revenue growth only increasing by 70% into context it looks even worse!
rdlecler1|5 years ago If LTV >> CaC then spend. disgruntledphd2|5 years ago Assuming your LTV calculations are correct, then this will work out.LTV models are really, really hard to get right though, and I've seen a bunch of startups go bust because of getting this wrong. load replies (1)
disgruntledphd2|5 years ago Assuming your LTV calculations are correct, then this will work out.LTV models are really, really hard to get right though, and I've seen a bunch of startups go bust because of getting this wrong. load replies (1)
darkwizard42|5 years ago While in a vacuum larger losses aren't painting the full picture, but then if you take their revenue growth only increasing by 70% into context it looks even worse!
rdlecler1|5 years ago
disgruntledphd2|5 years ago
LTV models are really, really hard to get right though, and I've seen a bunch of startups go bust because of getting this wrong.
darkwizard42|5 years ago