top | item 25169446

Dutch journalist gatecrashes EU defence video conference

80 points| rb2e | 5 years ago |bbc.co.uk

90 comments

order

FatalLogic|5 years ago

According to a screenshot that the journalist posted on Twitter, it appears like the video conference session is browser-based, and the pin and username are in the browser URL in plaintext.

So then if you can see anyone's screen, or any clear photo of it, you can easily join the conference. Seems like very poor security design if that's so

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnRlaFeWMAQzyIS?format=jpg

The software URL format looks similar to that used by Pexip.com

cblconfederate|5 years ago

this should require something more than a URL, even a skype meeting would be more secure.

FatalLogic|5 years ago

If he joined the video conference to watch and listen, but just sent a blank screen video, or maybe a freeze frame of an empty chair, would anyone have noticed?

snypher|5 years ago

I remember being in voice chat for a space spreadsheet game [0] and hearing the 'ding' for a new user joining the channel. Everyone knew to stop taking lest a spy discover where our fleet was. I really hope there's a similar reaction in these chats!

[0]eve-online.com

zaroth|5 years ago

I think they should be a lot more concerned about the people recording the meeting who don't show up on the attendee list, than of the people who show up and wave in front of the camera.

pkz|5 years ago

The conference chair couldn't help giggling. What was it he said? "Hey you better hang up before the police arrives"?

jariel|5 years ago

It's very serious stuff, it's not funny.

Someone leaves their doors unlocked it doesn't mean you should be entering.

More importantly, how on bloody earth are defence discussions happening in a situation that can so easily be defeated.

The officials themselves are to blame for blatantly terrible security protocols.

rosmax_1337|5 years ago

They're laughing right now, but really these kinds of mistakes are telling how weak the security of various agencies are.

fakedang|5 years ago

EU militaries are a joke tbf. Apart from France and (formerly) the UK, most of them can't do shit except sell firearms to Arab despots. I think someone from Romania here mentioned that they trust the US to protect them more than they trust France or Germany.

curiousllama|5 years ago

Note that there are different levels of "secret" when it comes to this stuff. Given the size of that meeting (20+ people) and the reaction, I'd be surprised if the topic matter was more secret than how much the defense agencies pay their employees - secret, no doubt, but not exactly the nuclear launch codes.

estaseuropano|5 years ago

Indeed this was a ministerial level conference, the prep meetings are probably more secure and no one would be stupid enough there to share screenshots.

At least since Snowden EU leaders probably always assume that someone is listening in. NSA and GHQ had breached Belgacom (Belgian former telecoms monopoly) to listen in on the EU.

kyriakos|5 years ago

Its amazing how well they took it, laughing and all

fakedang|5 years ago

Probably because they secretly knew that if word gets out real fast (which it won't because it'll controlled by them), they'll all be booted from office.

Sure word got out, but it need not reach most of the populace.

aequitas|5 years ago

I wonder, I he was sitting in a suit and in a room with some flags behind him (not in his shirt in an ordinary office) if anyone would have even noticed he was intruding on their conference. They laugh it off now because he doesn't fit in.

bouk|5 years ago

Probably if he didn't turn on his camera then nobody would've noticed at all.

andrepd|5 years ago

This is profoundly depressing. The fact that an EU defence conference is being held... on Zoom, is truly a microcosm of what has been the strategic policy of the EU for the past 20-30 years. We have sold off our independence, out advantages economic and otherwise, for pennies. For minuscule short-term gains, we have sold off our industry, our tech, to a hostile and totalitarian government. Well when I say "we" I mean private enterprise, but also the governments who were supposed to be raking in (though as one German economist said, government and private enterprise are pretty much one and the same).

It will come soon a time (in fact, it's pretty much here already) where China calls the shots over us. "Obey, or no microchips for you. In fact, no manufacturing of any kind." Thoroughly depressing.

Moodles|5 years ago

The Zoom security debate has been hashed to death on HN lately, but Webex for example patched some RCEs only a couple weeks ago. I’m not fully convinced Zoom is objectively less secure than all the other alternatives these days. They just get a lot more attention for it.

Besides, if the EU defence conference had an open URL or weak password that issue would apply regardless of Zoom, Webex, etc.

john_minsk|5 years ago

It is not that simple. The minute China does it - they stand alone. The whole premise of outsourcing manufacturing to China will die. No one will trust them to do it. In my opinion they won’t do it

AsyncAwait|5 years ago

> It will come soon a time (in fact, it's pretty much here already) where China calls the shots over us.

The U.S. already does that. Why is that any better?

dba7dba|5 years ago

One of the ways China managed to hack into America's F35 (or F22) fighter development program was listening into a conference call of various vendors discussing project status.

0dmethz|5 years ago

Of course they respond with the obligatory "we'll report this to the authorities", rather than "thank you for pointing this out in a harmless way we'll do better".

curiousllama|5 years ago

It was humor... The "threatener" was laughing, the audience was laughing, and the journalist laughed too.

Probably the best response you can hope for in the moment.

inglor_cz|5 years ago

Yeah, the problem with online meetings is that someone else might be taking part as well, unseen and unheard.

Does not matter as much if you discuss reconstruction of a mountain hut, matters a lot in defence, espionage or diplomacy.

praptak|5 years ago

Not sure how confidential that conference was but I'd imagine these use at least a 2FA dongle to authenticate. This is surprising.

pkz|5 years ago

It was a six-digit pin of which 5 digits were accidentally shown in a tweet from the Dutch Defence Minister Ank Bijleveld.

pkz|5 years ago

Had the laptop had a 15 inch screen it would likely have shown the entire URL including the full PIN code. Also visible in the screen are bookmarks to Netflix and what looks like barber shop music. Also a Gmail tab open. Did now know defense ministers were using Gmail on official hardware...

claudex|5 years ago

Some sources said they will hold off further meetings until the security is improved.

j0057|5 years ago

You'd imagine, but this conference software apparently only requires a pin that's visible as a GET parameter in the URL. I don't think you can blame the users for posting a screen shot.

tdons|5 years ago

What's more depressing is that this official has GMail open. How ridiculous is that? Which defense minister outside of the USA uses Google Mail? After Snowden, really?

I want to facepalm so hard right now.

hawk_|5 years ago

Unfortunately the bureaucrats still go through dated curriculum to get where they are and there no incentives to keep up with the times, technology or otherwise. These same people decide on the criteria for the incoming class and the vicious cycle goes on.

bserge|5 years ago

And these are the people pushing for laws around encryption. They have no idea what they're doing. In fact, that's really odd - you'd think that by now, tech-competent people would be in positions of power. Why aren't they?

cblconfederate|5 years ago

EU has no defense anyway so this is not entirely disastrous, though still very unacceptable.