top | item 25174436

(no title)

sohamsankaran | 5 years ago

This has been obvious for months -- Romer has been yelling from the rooftops about it -- and yet no major western govt save the Brits have attempted to even try this strategy. Madness.

discuss

order

twblalock|5 years ago

> and yet no major western govt save the Brits have attempted to even try this strategy.

The per-capita death rate in the UK is one of the worst in the world for this pandemic, and it's higher than the USA's. And they are now into a second lockdown. Whatever their strategy is, it's not working well at all.

threeseed|5 years ago

Because the more effective and proven strategy is to simply pay businesses and people to lockdown.

It has been effectively eliminated in both Australia and NZ this way. And the impact to the economy is significant but it's turning out to be far less severe than the rest of the world and their on/off again strategy.

anonytrary|5 years ago

> simply pay businesses and people to lockdown

This is anything but simple. Vast majority of businesses and people will not be supported if indefinite lockdown continues. The hidden costs of bankrolling an entire country for an indefinite period is much greater than the cost to deploy a persistent, scalable testing framework. The latter is also an investment into the future as this will not be the last pandemic.

eloff|5 years ago

You can't really compare two sparsely populated islands at the "end" of the Earth to the US or Europe.

shalmanese|5 years ago

China moved on from lockdowns over 6 months ago. They switched to citywide testing with 5:1 and then 10:1 pooled PCR tests in May and then recently switched to pooled rapid antigen testing. With the current testing methodology, they place one sample on a test strip, wait to see if there's a color change, and if not, they'll put a subsequent sample on. You can use a single antigen test for up to 10 people and patients get their results while at the testing site.