> By "argue" they almost mean "troll". Meaningful debate, from all the examples I've seen, does not appear to be a skill of this new lifeform.
That's good enough to use for disinformation and other kinds of control. The propaganda tactic that actually seems to work is not to convince your opponents of anything, but rather to exhaust, fragment, and confuse them.
The level of discussion presented by the MongoDB fan in that video is basically what GPT-3 does, completely superficial waffle strung together in roughly valid sentences.
Obviously 80% of everything else is crap too, but our brains do it for about 20W. That latter figure makes me think we aren't even close.
I'm getting a bug halfway down the page with Firefox on Android, couldn't read about learning to code.
Coding may be a good use of this as someone noted that gpt3 can often give creative answers more often than objective answers.
There currently is no objective solution to problems after abstraction. "Good enough" is somewhat the motto in programming.
On the contrary, if you ask it to design a bridge(or new invention), it would need to combine both specifications with somewhat complicated physics and geometry. Unlike in Programming, 'Good enough' is not ok, it needs to be perfect.
Would be a fantastic tool if every profession could skip the time consuming process of writing and debugging code.
[+] [-] throwaway4good|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zakember|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jb1991|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ardy42|5 years ago|reply
That's good enough to use for disinformation and other kinds of control. The propaganda tactic that actually seems to work is not to convince your opponents of anything, but rather to exhaust, fragment, and confuse them.
[+] [-] wagslane|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] commonturtle|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alexvoda|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joana035|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] OzzyB|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] thrill|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rxsel|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mhh__|5 years ago|reply
Obviously 80% of everything else is crap too, but our brains do it for about 20W. That latter figure makes me think we aren't even close.
[+] [-] corobo|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] free2OSS|5 years ago|reply
Coding may be a good use of this as someone noted that gpt3 can often give creative answers more often than objective answers.
There currently is no objective solution to problems after abstraction. "Good enough" is somewhat the motto in programming.
On the contrary, if you ask it to design a bridge(or new invention), it would need to combine both specifications with somewhat complicated physics and geometry. Unlike in Programming, 'Good enough' is not ok, it needs to be perfect.
Would be a fantastic tool if every profession could skip the time consuming process of writing and debugging code.