Still skeptical. MRIs aren't that precise and we've seen similar epidemics before that turned out to be fake and driven by mass hysteria. Someone reports an unusual effect or illness and suddenly everyone attributes any weird feelings/illnesses with the same thing.
The symptoms mentioned in these cases are “fleeting and transient.” That is very much not the case here. People are suffering from long term, serious, physically verifiable injury.
These would be directional microwave weapons, not run of the mill microwaves. The people affected have evidence of neurological damage, so it’s not just psychological.
Serious question: I'm not a lawyer, but isn't attacks on diplomatic officials considered an act of aggression? Thus can lead to international denouncement and potential UN actions?
Yes intentionally harming diplomats could be considered an act of war. The trouble here is they still have plausible deniability; there's no hard proof.
Depending on the wavelength I guess there exist lightweight mesh fabrics that are pretty efficient at blocking waves. Wonder if that would work for this application.
I'm fairly sure I remember the insect science community suggested cicadas or something at one point, I don't think it's impossible. More likely than antagonism honestly
[+] [-] valuearb|5 years ago|reply
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/1999/jul/06/healtha...
[+] [-] pyuser583|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] maxlamb|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] PradeetPatel|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nradov|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] runawaybottle|5 years ago|reply
Here’s the fake news version: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2020/11/20/disput...
As this news turns less fake, how does one defend against microwave attacks?
[+] [-] axaxs|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dayjobpork|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tt433|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] CyanBird|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nix23|5 years ago|reply