(no title)
Hexstream | 5 years ago
We could do a better job of proving it and demonstrating it to the world, and it would be easier to do it faster with funding.
Hexstream | 5 years ago
We could do a better job of proving it and demonstrating it to the world, and it would be easier to do it faster with funding.
Rochus|5 years ago
I first used Lisp more than thirty years ago (back then on the VAX), but I still don't understand why it is supposed to be the "best programming language" (as some people continue to claim). It is not even obvious to me how to recognize a programming language as the "best" one. The advantage of the simple syntax is paid with several disadvantages. Praising Lisp for its simple syntax is like praising a protein for its simple structure consisting only of a chain of amino acids.
Hexstream|5 years ago
Here is just a trivial sample: https://twitter.com/HexstreamSoft/status/1334220825281654785
Fairly extensive advocacy pieces already exist, and we need even more sophisticated ones, and better infrastructure overall, and it would be much easier to do that with proper funding.
fermienrico|5 years ago
Hexstream|5 years ago
I am aiming to help make Common Lisp (or a close descendant) a top 5 programming language by 2040.
I believe this is eminently achievable given proper approaches, and funding me would certainly help towards that goal.
https://twitter.com/HexstreamSoft/status/1213964177657794577