You’re missing the main point of the judge’s decision, which is that this strategy doesn’t factor in the severe pain caused to people’s financial livelihoods.
I’m trying to figure out the point in human history where the well-being of individuals or industries was prioritized over the well-being of the entire population.
Someone’s financial livelihood should not be more important than a population’s health.
ecf|5 years ago
Someone’s financial livelihood should not be more important than a population’s health.