(no title)
mxskelly | 5 years ago
I've always done my best to err on the side of "let's try not to add yet another level of complexity" and this strategy has yet to fail me.
mxskelly | 5 years ago
I've always done my best to err on the side of "let's try not to add yet another level of complexity" and this strategy has yet to fail me.
nrmitchi|5 years ago
They're not really "yet another startup".
I also don't think that the departments of the US Government are all going around all willy-nilly dropping tools from "yet another startup" into their core infrastructure.
While your overall point may be valid, it's tough to come to the conclusion that it is applicable here.
falcolas|5 years ago
And, if we're being honest, those technologies probably are based off startup tech; SolarWinds purchases and incorporates startup companies (such as Vivid Cortex recently).
mcguire|5 years ago
Corporate IT, too, from what I've seen.
wglb|5 years ago
reaperducer|5 years ago
Today it is. If we knew when SolarWinds was added to the government systems, his comment might stand.
hobs|5 years ago
Age doesn't imply its good either, but blaming startups isn't the problem here.
onetimemanytime|5 years ago
Russia agrees.
Karunamon|5 years ago
falcolas|5 years ago
So, never. At least, not in our current software development industry.