Kudos to the developer for having a nicely presented web site for the project too, and not just a github repo. All too often, a lot of awesome projects hide on github without some upfront presentation of the work beyond a short README file.
The developer will know why their work is great and how it can help others, but you have to make it easy to recognize for the uninitiated too. That still applies for technical projects that are going to require advanced programming efforts to integrate anyway. Don't think of it as marketing, think of it as a necessary step to evangelizing your work and bringing its benefits to a wider audience.
I honestly expected to pay for this until I hit 'Get the code' and saw a github page. Simply making the website aesthetically pleasing increased my willingness to download and pay by an order of magnitude.
There was a lot of care in delivering this product. As others have pointed out, this is so compellingly done that you could legitimately expect to pay for it. But no, it's open sourced - thank you very much for that.
I definitely now have plans to incorporate this as an experiment in the next application I cook up. Excited to have an option available which can reduce admin development time dramatically, freeing me up to worry almost entirely on UX and front functionality.
This reminds me of a recent research I've done on admin user interfaces in general. This one looks pretty spiffy, but there are good alternatives if you don't necessarily need the full framework. Here are some leads I've found:
They all seem too "thick". I guess they might work if I was starting from scratch but they look like a pain to migrate to. Has anyone come up with something much leaner?
Active Admin does look very pretty, but in defense of ActiveScaffold, it is simple, works, and is easy to set up. Being able to throw up Active Scaffold generated pages has saved me a ton of time over the last couple years.
[+] [-] jschuur|15 years ago|reply
The developer will know why their work is great and how it can help others, but you have to make it easy to recognize for the uninitiated too. That still applies for technical projects that are going to require advanced programming efforts to integrate anyway. Don't think of it as marketing, think of it as a necessary step to evangelizing your work and bringing its benefits to a wider audience.
[+] [-] ryanlchan|15 years ago|reply
Even now I'm looking for a donate button.
[+] [-] acangiano|15 years ago|reply
Which is marketing. A very good thing if done right, despite how some developers instinctually feel about it.
[+] [-] drewda|15 years ago|reply
[1] https://github.com/sferik/rails_admin/
[2] https://github.com/sferik/rails_admin/issues/317
[+] [-] audionerd|15 years ago|reply
A couple things I'd like to see addressed from the author:
- How is Active Admin's approach different?
- Why would someone choose Active Admin over RailsAdmin?
[+] [-] esmevane|15 years ago|reply
There was a lot of care in delivering this product. As others have pointed out, this is so compellingly done that you could legitimately expect to pay for it. But no, it's open sourced - thank you very much for that.
I definitely now have plans to incorporate this as an experiment in the next application I cook up. Excited to have an option available which can reduce admin development time dramatically, freeing me up to worry almost entirely on UX and front functionality.
[+] [-] charlesju|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gregbell|15 years ago|reply
Active Admin provides similar features, but does so with a DSL instead of implementing classes, as is the case with Django Admin.
[+] [-] arturadib|15 years ago|reply
https://github.com/pilu/web-app-theme
http://guitemplates.com/
http://www.uitemplates.com/
http://webguitemplates.com/
http://www.webappers.com/2009/09/18/20-professional-web-admi...
[+] [-] pbreit|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mattvague|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jkahn|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stretchwithme|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nikdotca|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jarin|15 years ago|reply
We had a long run, Typus, no regrets…
[+] [-] picardo|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] trungonnews|15 years ago|reply
I remember some time ago, ActiveScaffold was the king of admin tools... Now I can hardly keep up with the new name for these admin projects.
[+] [-] stackus|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pcreux|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cynusx|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] NoPiece|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] briandoll|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pcreux|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phatbyte|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gourneau|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Dobbs|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gregbell|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geeksean|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hiroprot|15 years ago|reply