top | item 2549440

Mozilla: Browser Benchmarks Suck

12 points| peternorton | 15 years ago |conceivablytech.com | reply

4 comments

order
[+] wanderr|15 years ago|reply
I'd say it's more like benchmarks don't tell the whole story. They should still be good for catching obvious regressions before any code hits a real user's machine, but having real world data should help to identify a whole bunch of bottlenecks that were unknown before, and determine if performance tweaks are actually helping.
[+] grahamedgecombe|15 years ago|reply
It's a shame browsers focus so much on JavaScript performance. I tried FF4 a few weeks ago and the user interface itself just feels slow whereas Chrome's interface is much snappier. It'd be great if all of the browser vendors realised that JavaScript doesn't tell the whole story!
[+] unknown|15 years ago|reply

[deleted]

[+] asomiv|15 years ago|reply
Fairly obvious that it's slower than IE? Says who?

You treat "repaint" as if it's a single thing that's either faster in all cases or slower in all cases. Browser rendering is a very complex thing and some pages render faster in one browser while other pages render faster in another.