It's amazing that people don't use adblockers. uBlock Origin on desktop, also works on mobile such as Firefox Android, Kiwi browser, etc. On iOS you can use AdGuard, Edge with adblockers, Wipr, etc.
Also, SponsorBlock for YouTube to block sponsors inside videos, and even uMatrix if you want to globally disable JS and select which sites do use JS.
I use the DuckDuckGo browser on iPhone and Brave on desktop, and Gizmodo (along with most of the web) is not bad. Occasionally, I have to do something from my wife’s computer, and it’s astounding how crippled the web experience is without a decent browser.
Nextdns + Firefox reader mode makes it ok. Couldn’t find any other way to get rid of this “what’s new in macOS” video that was taking up half the page otherwise.
If these videos are real-time and not slowed down, I think the word “punch” is a little hyperbolic.
It’s more like a push or a nudge.
Saying that “octopuses punch fish” makes it sound violent, but it doesn’t look like the octopus intends to harm the fish at all.
These videos may be out of context. Some fish behave perfectly nice while eating, but are obnoxious most other times. The person recording this may have never seen the fish before, but an octopus has incredible memory and may have a hate on for something it did before. They certainly remember humans.
These punches are thrown to “prevent exploitation and ensure collaboration."
Best quote from from the article. Reminded me of "The Three Stooges"
The world would be a better place if you could slap a selfish idiot when they are doing something idiotic. Or maybe not.
I’ve kept ornamental fish for many years and certainly octopuses are not fish but it looks to me that it’s only keeping others away from its territory like many fish do.
I'm not sure if there is a deeper meaning in your comment I'm missing, but octopi, whilst being a word that people use, is strictly speaking wrong (in a prescriptive sense).
Octopus is a 3rd declension noun in Latin coming from Greek. If one believes nouns should be pluralised according to their origin - which someone using the second declension latin -i plural would likely be - then it follows that one should say octopodes. [0]
Of course this can be solved in a rational way by using the English plurals as they used in the article to both avoid unusual sounding words and technical incorrectness.
I heard of an octopus in a marine biology lab that was able to work out that the feeder was controlled by an app on the postdoc's phone, and the cephalopod was able to sneak the phone out of the postdocs pocket, unlock it, and activate the feeder, then place the phone back, multiple times before the postdocs wised up.
This doesn't even make sense. Even if it connected the phone and the food it also figured out how to navigate an unfamiliar operating system? A good portion of humans get stuck on that
[+] [-] dmix|5 years ago|reply
Edit: found two original sources, no good summary article yet though https://twitter.com/octoeduardo/status/1340076579108646913?s...
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy....
Edit 2: the original study PDF is only 8 pages and is an easy read; dunno the policy on linking to scihub here but here you go, I’ll delete if needed https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2020-12-19/fd/[email protected]....
[+] [-] baxtr|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wizzwizz4|5 years ago|reply
(That being said, it's a good opportunity to update my list of Sci-Hub domains – just to make sure I don't accidentally use any, of course.)
[+] [-] hyperpallium2|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] GoblinSlayer|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] semi-extrinsic|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 1vuio0pswjnm7|5 years ago|reply
Make a mobile-friendly, text-only version with no ads:
[+] [-] cercatrova|5 years ago|reply
Also, SponsorBlock for YouTube to block sponsors inside videos, and even uMatrix if you want to globally disable JS and select which sites do use JS.
[+] [-] LilBytes|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] christophilus|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ornornor|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pmontra|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] C19is20|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] akudha|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tcbawo|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anonymfus|5 years ago|reply
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24788275
[+] [-] rembicilious|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 867-5309|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dade_|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sitkack|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dukeofdoom|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] goatherders|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] makz|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Finnucane|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dghughes|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tictac0429|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] joshxyz|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cheaprentalyeti|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tdy721|5 years ago|reply
punches fish
[+] [-] agurk|5 years ago|reply
Octopus is a 3rd declension noun in Latin coming from Greek. If one believes nouns should be pluralised according to their origin - which someone using the second declension latin -i plural would likely be - then it follows that one should say octopodes. [0]
Of course this can be solved in a rational way by using the English plurals as they used in the article to both avoid unusual sounding words and technical incorrectness.
[0] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/octopus
[+] [-] graderjs|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thatguy0900|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] luma|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slyfocks|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] webmobdev|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mistersquid|5 years ago|reply
Woman, alone, at door: Who’s there?
Voice, behind door: Candygram…
[+] [-] graderjs|5 years ago|reply
Honestly tho, I do believe an octopus could learn to do this.
[+] [-] hackeraccount|5 years ago|reply