top | item 25545745 (no title) THE_PUN_STOPS | 5 years ago Just open the case and disconnect the wifi antenna or, in the case of a PCB etched antenna, apply X-acto blade.See! It's opt-in. discuss order hn newest robocat|5 years ago “Disabling Wireless Signals from Samsung Smart TV“ https://emfaction.userecho.com/en/communities/1/topics/124-d... EricE|5 years ago Or just don't buy Samsung TVs. Their UI's are crap even for the "dumb" functions. EricE|5 years ago He's not doing that because the TV is connecting to wifi, he's concerned about "wifi radiation" - sigh. load replies (1) perlgeek|5 years ago If you have to take action for it not to do something, it's opt-out, not opt-in. ianai|5 years ago Pretty sure you’re being sarcastic saying that’s a valid thing to expect end users to do to opt out. And I agree. Wish mining peoples privacy wasn’t accepted norm. rdc12|5 years ago Not sure if this is more or less extreme option, but you could put the TV in a Faraday cage, or build a Faraday cage into your walls. jankotek|5 years ago Perfectly valid solution, and it gets downvoted on Hacker News... mark-r|5 years ago The implication is that this isn't a problem that can't be solved, and thus stronger remedies are unnecessary. There might be some who disagree. cgrealy|5 years ago To be fair, I don’t think most people would consider a solution that voids the warranty on an expensive TV valid... load replies (1)
robocat|5 years ago “Disabling Wireless Signals from Samsung Smart TV“ https://emfaction.userecho.com/en/communities/1/topics/124-d... EricE|5 years ago Or just don't buy Samsung TVs. Their UI's are crap even for the "dumb" functions. EricE|5 years ago He's not doing that because the TV is connecting to wifi, he's concerned about "wifi radiation" - sigh. load replies (1)
EricE|5 years ago He's not doing that because the TV is connecting to wifi, he's concerned about "wifi radiation" - sigh. load replies (1)
perlgeek|5 years ago If you have to take action for it not to do something, it's opt-out, not opt-in.
ianai|5 years ago Pretty sure you’re being sarcastic saying that’s a valid thing to expect end users to do to opt out. And I agree. Wish mining peoples privacy wasn’t accepted norm.
rdc12|5 years ago Not sure if this is more or less extreme option, but you could put the TV in a Faraday cage, or build a Faraday cage into your walls.
jankotek|5 years ago Perfectly valid solution, and it gets downvoted on Hacker News... mark-r|5 years ago The implication is that this isn't a problem that can't be solved, and thus stronger remedies are unnecessary. There might be some who disagree. cgrealy|5 years ago To be fair, I don’t think most people would consider a solution that voids the warranty on an expensive TV valid... load replies (1)
mark-r|5 years ago The implication is that this isn't a problem that can't be solved, and thus stronger remedies are unnecessary. There might be some who disagree.
cgrealy|5 years ago To be fair, I don’t think most people would consider a solution that voids the warranty on an expensive TV valid... load replies (1)
robocat|5 years ago
EricE|5 years ago
EricE|5 years ago
perlgeek|5 years ago
ianai|5 years ago
rdc12|5 years ago
jankotek|5 years ago
mark-r|5 years ago
cgrealy|5 years ago