top | item 25579945

(no title)

jackcodes | 5 years ago

I think you’re significantly over-estimating the ease of keeping them away from older people.

discuss

order

colordrops|5 years ago

Trillions have been spent in the US on bailouts. You could have paid for full time care for every single vulnerable person for a year at that cost, and left everyone else to live normally.

refactor_master|5 years ago

And how would this presumably completely non-disease-transmissible full time care manifest itself? With doctors and nurses that also have kids, and social lives, and thus a chance to transmit disease.

seszett|5 years ago

It's not just a question of paying for the care for vulnerable persons. But young people sometimes also want to see their parents at least a few times a year, even if they aren't vulnerable and can care for themselves.

raverbashing|5 years ago

And who's supposed to take care of the elderly? Oh that's right, young people

Great plan