top | item 25749073

(no title)

anthonyrstevens | 5 years ago

You're arguing against a straw man. No one is saying "ban them for their thoughts", they are saying "ban them for inciting violence".

(cue the desperate, too-cute-by-half arguments "but are they REALLY inciting violence?")

discuss

order

Sohcahtoa82|5 years ago

Yup.

It's a bad faith argument, yet it's everywhere. I'd think HN would be better than that, yet here we are, having the same fight every time free speech is the topic.

Also note that the parent mentioned "government action" whereas the GP is referring to a business taking action. The distinction is incredibly important, yet so many free-speech purists respond to corporate action as if it was a government action.