top | item 25760056

(no title)

freebear | 5 years ago

Are you saying that the ones who take this pandemic serious also take the "ghastly future of mass extinction" serious?

I oppose this 100%, I take the "ghastly future of mass extinction" very serious and my solution would be to introduce a close to zero birthrate of the extremely overpopulated species of Homo Sapiens. I do not however take this pandemic serious at all and it is NOTHING compared to what is and will happen in the "ghastly future".

We are living in a planetary wide human farm, they told us this was gonna happen! And it will happen again and again until we have devoured the planet.

discuss

order

jhanschoo|5 years ago

Zero fertility would introduce an aging crisis.

toomuchtodo|5 years ago

Which is preferable to a resource exhaustion crisis. Can’t kick the can forever.

Most of the world is at or below a total fertility rate replacement rate (2.1). The trend simply needs to continue for ~10-15 years to lock in the population decline.

ojhughes|5 years ago

Zero population growth would be a terrifying dystopia. Have you read /watched the Handmaid's Tale or Children of Men?

o-__-o|5 years ago

Similarly one could take “election fraud” seriously but not the pandemic or climate change.