top | item 25763931

Decentralised Content Moderation

12 points| cloakedarbiter | 5 years ago |martin.kleppmann.com

3 comments

order

sthnblllII|5 years ago

Here's a tldr;

>spammers, neo-nazis, and child pornographers (or any other type of content that you consider despicable)

>Wikipedia editors are predominantly white, male

>it may be appropriate to take into account the power relationships between the people involved, and hold the privileged and powerful to a higher standard than the oppressed and disadvantaged, since otherwise the system may end up reinforcing existing imbalances

rkangel|5 years ago

That's an interesting take home from the article.

What I got from it was "We can create distributed social networks that are censorship resistant (this is a problem with technical solutions), but that isn't necessarily a good idea. Some form of decentralised moderation process is also needed (which is both a social and technical problem)."

rkangel|5 years ago

The author is a researcher on distributed systems. I found this video from him to be an excellent first education on CRDTs, how they work, what they're good for and what they aren't (yet) good for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7drE24geUw