top | item 25827324 (no title) yaboy | 5 years ago You’re both wrong. 100k visitors per month ≠ 100k unique users per month. Very different things! discuss order hn newest sixQuarks|5 years ago You're being super nit-picky. It should have been assumed 100K "visitors" meant uniques, but I knew someone like you might make this comment. 100K * 12 = 1,200,000 visitors. I added a 20% margin to account for return visitors. yaboy|5 years ago I’d like to see you tell your founder or CMO that the difference between monthly visitors and monthly unique visitors is “super nit-picky”.The 20% margin is risible and those who live by SEO die by SEO: https://cdixon.org/2011/03/05/seo-is-no-longer-a-viable-mark... saaaaaam|5 years ago Well, quite! But then I pretty much assumed it was a shorthand amongst peers so (over) explanation perhaps wasn’t really necessary...
sixQuarks|5 years ago You're being super nit-picky. It should have been assumed 100K "visitors" meant uniques, but I knew someone like you might make this comment. 100K * 12 = 1,200,000 visitors. I added a 20% margin to account for return visitors. yaboy|5 years ago I’d like to see you tell your founder or CMO that the difference between monthly visitors and monthly unique visitors is “super nit-picky”.The 20% margin is risible and those who live by SEO die by SEO: https://cdixon.org/2011/03/05/seo-is-no-longer-a-viable-mark...
yaboy|5 years ago I’d like to see you tell your founder or CMO that the difference between monthly visitors and monthly unique visitors is “super nit-picky”.The 20% margin is risible and those who live by SEO die by SEO: https://cdixon.org/2011/03/05/seo-is-no-longer-a-viable-mark...
saaaaaam|5 years ago Well, quite! But then I pretty much assumed it was a shorthand amongst peers so (over) explanation perhaps wasn’t really necessary...
sixQuarks|5 years ago
yaboy|5 years ago
The 20% margin is risible and those who live by SEO die by SEO: https://cdixon.org/2011/03/05/seo-is-no-longer-a-viable-mark...
saaaaaam|5 years ago