top | item 25838743 (no title) nenolod | 5 years ago I read that article and it is very redolent of what SCO argued back in the day. If they had actual proof, they would take legal action against the author of that plugin. discuss order hn newest bonzini|5 years ago They did in September 2019. Is literally the first sentence of the linked article and it links to https://www.elastic.co/blog/dear-search-guard-users.I am not sure of the outcome. joshuaissac|5 years ago > I read that article [...] If they had actual proof, they would take legal action against the author of that plugin.The first sentence of that article:> Back on September 4th, we filed a lawsuit against floragunn GmbH, the makers of Search Guard, a security plugin for Elasticsearch nenolod|5 years ago Yeah? SCO sued a bunch of people too. They haven't won, though. load replies (1)
bonzini|5 years ago They did in September 2019. Is literally the first sentence of the linked article and it links to https://www.elastic.co/blog/dear-search-guard-users.I am not sure of the outcome.
joshuaissac|5 years ago > I read that article [...] If they had actual proof, they would take legal action against the author of that plugin.The first sentence of that article:> Back on September 4th, we filed a lawsuit against floragunn GmbH, the makers of Search Guard, a security plugin for Elasticsearch nenolod|5 years ago Yeah? SCO sued a bunch of people too. They haven't won, though. load replies (1)
bonzini|5 years ago
I am not sure of the outcome.
joshuaissac|5 years ago
The first sentence of that article:
> Back on September 4th, we filed a lawsuit against floragunn GmbH, the makers of Search Guard, a security plugin for Elasticsearch
nenolod|5 years ago