At a glance, I'd be unclear on what set of scenarios they expect the site to help out with. The person would need to type the right search term and hopefully land on the right result. If they wanted to use the navigation, it seems hovering over the menu items doesn't show you the structure of the site-- you need to click into each individual tab. It's pretty but hard to gauge how useful it is.
Totally! I think the search term issue will get addressed as the datasets get tagged with more near and similar terms so it populates the search results with a wider net of results. (like misspellings, synonyms, topic and category terms, etc).
I feel like we talked about topics being a search result too, but there was some barrier to the search tool to get it to work with other page types. That'd fix a lot too.
Honestly, love the design, few location that will need accessibility and bug on overlays and a few margins, browser stack or something similar in testing by your QA engineer all full cylinders.
Wow, so cool that you did this and
are looking for feedback on HN!
I have worked on some projects inside
big organizations with a lot of red tape
and politics and I have to imagine that
this must be a real challenge for you as
well right? What have you found worked
in terms of being able to put users first
instead of higher ups in the chain of command?
Search:
- I tried 3 search queries and no results.
- It looks like the entire corpus is only 97 entries.
I would suggest considering removing search all together,
and instead just putting the data in a single packed
table. You can fit 100 rows of data in 3 scrolls.
Then someone can "search with their eyes" or even ctrl+f.
- As a rule of thumb, I try to wait until I have over 10,000
rows before I add any type of search to a page. At the very
least, I never add search when I have less than 1,000 items.
Measure the time it takes people to find things and you'll
see probably a 10x speed up if you go to a single page.
Information Density:
A general critique I have is that there is
very low information density on this site.
You could fit 1,000% more information on these pages.
A book I highly, highly recommend, that you can buy used
for only $1.49, is New York Times Page One:
NYTimes has been serving the people of America for over a century,
and so you'll see the patterns they've evolved over the past 100+
years. One of the main ones is high information density.
I would try and cram more and more on the page. People that need
bigger fonts and more accessibility have a range of tools on their
devices to transform sites into accessible version for them. Now
I've been in places where leaders pushed back against this, but I
can tell you for a fact that your numbers will skyrocket if you
go to higher information density which will increase the odds
people will find the info they are looking for in a shorter time
period and eventually come back to your site.
Visualizations:
I would put search in a corner, and one of your
most interesting visualizations front and center!
What are the top 10 coolest stories you've found while
working on this site, with this data? Bring some of those to life!
Great stuff! Thanks for your work and for sharing here!
(Source: I work on software at Our World in Data, and
am also a medical researcher and work on various related tech)
[+] [-] meowsnow|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] austinbeer|5 years ago|reply
I feel like we talked about topics being a search result too, but there was some barrier to the search tool to get it to work with other page types. That'd fix a lot too.
[+] [-] cs404|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] austinbeer|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] breck|5 years ago|reply
I have worked on some projects inside big organizations with a lot of red tape and politics and I have to imagine that this must be a real challenge for you as well right? What have you found worked in terms of being able to put users first instead of higher ups in the chain of command?
Search:
- I tried 3 search queries and no results.
- It looks like the entire corpus is only 97 entries. I would suggest considering removing search all together, and instead just putting the data in a single packed table. You can fit 100 rows of data in 3 scrolls. Then someone can "search with their eyes" or even ctrl+f.
- As a rule of thumb, I try to wait until I have over 10,000 rows before I add any type of search to a page. At the very least, I never add search when I have less than 1,000 items. Measure the time it takes people to find things and you'll see probably a 10x speed up if you go to a single page.
Information Density:
A general critique I have is that there is very low information density on this site.
You could fit 1,000% more information on these pages.
A book I highly, highly recommend, that you can buy used for only $1.49, is New York Times Page One:
https://www.amazon.com/New-York-Times-Page-One/dp/1578660882
NYTimes has been serving the people of America for over a century, and so you'll see the patterns they've evolved over the past 100+ years. One of the main ones is high information density. I would try and cram more and more on the page. People that need bigger fonts and more accessibility have a range of tools on their devices to transform sites into accessible version for them. Now I've been in places where leaders pushed back against this, but I can tell you for a fact that your numbers will skyrocket if you go to higher information density which will increase the odds people will find the info they are looking for in a shorter time period and eventually come back to your site.
Visualizations:
I would put search in a corner, and one of your most interesting visualizations front and center! What are the top 10 coolest stories you've found while working on this site, with this data? Bring some of those to life!
Great stuff! Thanks for your work and for sharing here!
(Source: I work on software at Our World in Data, and am also a medical researcher and work on various related tech)