It's actually pretty much the same. As long as the government programs you are funding aren't too wasteful - and if they are the solution is to fix the waste - incurring sovereign debt is not that much different from foregoing revenue. The difference is that if you forego revenue from the top 1% you get worse outcomes than if you tax them or cut useful government spending or print debt.
Unironically, yes. Remember tax cuts isn't money just given away, the 1% didn't cause the spending part of the equation. You just think 1% should pay that tab.
rmk|5 years ago
JoBrad|5 years ago
sudosysgen|5 years ago
marcosdumay|5 years ago
eli_gottlieb|5 years ago
splintercell|5 years ago
sudosysgen|5 years ago