(no title)
the_drunkard | 5 years ago
The 2004 election also had its fair share of electronic voting criticism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_election_vo...
the_drunkard | 5 years ago
The 2004 election also had its fair share of electronic voting criticism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_election_vo...
justinzollars|5 years ago
What I saw was this. The voter file was completely inaccurate. It was very common to go to a residence where voters:
From my perspective there are real issues with sending unsolicited mail in ballots to homes because the government does such a bad job managing the voter file. Often it is deliberately mismanaged because "purging" a file is a loaded political term. Who wants to be that guy who deletes voters?Moreover, my role as a campaign staffer was to collect votes. Often, people would ask "what do I vote for?", and I would just point and tell them what to vote for. This is also common. It also feels unethical.
Based on this experience, I strongly support voting in person, with an ID.
Don't trust me. If you would like to see this for yourself, volunteer with a campaign (any party) and canvass an apartment building in a swing state.
the_drunkard|5 years ago
Shhh, a view like this will get you banned from Twitter... ;)