[isbadawi]

It's fine to take issue with charged language like the word "stolen", which can be interpreted in different ways; maybe you interpret that as "I won the vote count but the votes were changed", but it could also be reasonably interpreted as "I lost the vote count but I'm concerned people were influenced to vote that way through nefarious means".

I think there is a reasonable distinction between that statement and the specific claims of fraud we have been seeing for the last few months.

[pfdietz]

I think it's quite reasonable to conclude a horrible person, by his actions and statements, induced millions of people to vote a certain way. Perhaps not the way that person intended, mind you.