top | item 25935855

(no title)

dx87 | 5 years ago

My history class must have skipped over the part where the american revolution was organized on twitter and facebook.

discuss

order

dang|5 years ago

"Don't be snarky."

"Eschew flamebait."

Please stick to the site guidelines, no matter how wrong another commenter is or you feel they are. If we all work together we can avoid flamewar hell, which will keep HN interesting, which is in all of our interests.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

bussierem|5 years ago

Not that I necessarily condone the parent, but to be fair dang, the GP probably deserves the same reply at the very least.

crocodiletears|5 years ago

IIRC, The American revolution was coordinated and funded by the existing colonial administrations, with aid from France. It was a secessionist movement backed by regional business interests in response to a reassertion of imperial sovereignty by a previously lax British government.

Something to be proud of, certainly. But not a grassroots thing, even if it did have some degree of popular support.

WhompingWindows|5 years ago

Calling it a secessionist movement isn't an apt characterization, which in US history calls to mind the Southerners' attempt to Secede from the USA. The revolutionaries, rather, considered themselves a number of independent colonies, coming together in opposition to British rule, where they were lacking in representation. They would not see themselves as "part" of Britain in a way the Southerners clearly were part of the USA.

In contrast, the South was fully represented in the Northern government, and Lincoln was quite conciliatory and kind to them when he was able. However, they were fighting for an extremely immoral cause, which the 1776 Revolutionaries were not really doing as the issue of slavery was much less an issue than in the 1850's.

TeMPOraL|5 years ago

Was there ever a grassroot revolution that wasn't instigated, or at least backed, by foreign powers? I can't think of one.

axlee|5 years ago

It was organized by the wealthiest people in the country. If you believe this revolution was coming from the "grassroot", you are awfully mistaken.

capableweb|5 years ago

Then maybe look outside your own borders for some other examples. The Arab Spring got great momentum from social media, and so do a lot of other efforts. Sometimes even bad efforts get momentum too. But it is possible to organize revolution via social media and other communication mediums.

munk-a|5 years ago

I think they actually coordinated with vines posted to their myspace pages... but easier out-of-band communication does lead to more general awareness of the populace. The American revolution might've happened much more quickly - or not at all when the Americans saw Bostonians dancing around in racist indian costumes and compared the relatively minor tax to living conditions back in England proper.

rocketpastsix|5 years ago

yea, I missed the part where Lee's defeat at Gettysburg was instagrammed and Grant's victory at Vicksburg was on TikTok

konjin|5 years ago

It must have been a very bad history class then:

>required that many printed materials in the colonies be produced on stamped paper produced in London, carrying an embossed revenue stamp.[1][2] Printed materials included legal documents, magazines, playing cards, newspapers, and many other types of paper used throughout the colonies, and it had to be paid in British currency, not in colonial paper money.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamp_Act_1765

The printing press was the social media of the 18th century. And just like then the powers that be have no idea what to do with it and are trying to put the Ginnie back in the bottle.