top | item 25943973

(no title)

jackfrodo | 5 years ago

What a betrayal of their customers. Really going mask-off with what it means for a startup to "democratize" an industry: allowing the little guy to chip in, but never actually compete with the big boys.

discuss

order

SirSavary|5 years ago

Not 100% the same but this feels similar to the Apple crowd explaining to me that I don't want an open computer in my pocket.

ChicagoBoy11|5 years ago

Yes and no. At no point did Apple sell me on the idea that I'd have an open computer in my pocket. In fact, they aggressively sell me on the opposite, and make it clear that they act as gate-keepers to what apps can and can't be in my pocket. Totally legitimate to take issue with that, but I think there's a marked difference between doing that and Robinhood arbitrarily preventing folks from doing these trades.

jackfrodo|5 years ago

Sure with broad strokes, it generally sucks when a tech company makes unilateral decisions for its customers, whether that's restricting which stocks you can buy or whether you can put unauthorized apps on your iPhone.

But I find it particularly egregious because the major principle of RH was that it was on the side of the everyman rather than institutions.

yottalove|5 years ago

This applies to Crypto as well. Negligible fundamentals. Negligible oversight.