top | item 25944051

GameStop: Anger as trading in GameStop shares is restricted

84 points| deedub | 5 years ago |bbc.com | reply

85 comments

order
[+] marcus_holmes|5 years ago|reply
> "This isn't investing, this is gambling"

Yep. Agreed. Spot-on. That's what Wall St does. If you don't like it, try and stop it. But for everyone, including the hedge funds.

Treating the derivatives markets like a casino (and taxing appropriately) sounds like a great idea.

[+] parhamn|5 years ago|reply
I get this knee jerk reaction but there is something to be said about the risk analysis, sophistication, etc of said hedge funds. They’re not gambling in the same sense, but sure in some sense they are. Even having an entry level “risk model” is more sophistication than most home traders.

You can’t just dismiss all that as nothing.

[+] boxed|5 years ago|reply
Seems like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Many derivatives are just insurance.
[+] mathattack|5 years ago|reply
Derivatives involves a lot of betting. It also involves legitimate hedging. A farmer can lock in their revenue, and a manufacturing company can lock in exchange rates.
[+] gruez|5 years ago|reply
While the title might be true for the "amateur investors" that got in early, I strongly believe that most of them are not outwitting anyone and will be bagholders. As of this post basically everyone who bought yesterday are underwater by 50%.
[+] Out_of_Characte|5 years ago|reply
Does it matter that your're underwater by 50%? The goal was to beat Wallstreet, They did.

The hedgefunds should definitely take note not to play a dangerous game because losing is always on the table.

[+] WrtCdEvrydy|5 years ago|reply
depends on when the positions are liquidated.

everyone who bought yesterday is fighting exchanges whose only option for GME is "sell" because buying is restricted.

I don't know how some of these shorts will find 20 million shares by tomorrow.

[+] rasz|5 years ago|reply
How are you going to become a bag holder of a stock shorted over 100%? Hedge funds will have to buy you out.
[+] ButterWashed|5 years ago|reply
Not being in the US I don't know this but can Robinhood be sued, like a lot of people seem to be calling for, just for refusing to handle trades on a stock?
[+] otaconjh|5 years ago|reply
Which can be viewed as market manipulation. I'm not in US either but it looks pretty dodgy on their part. A key message of all these new trading platforms is that your capital is at risk. Their users know this, so why are they restricting trades?
[+] multjoy|5 years ago|reply
The T&Cs will almost certainly allow them a huge amount of latitude in what they will let people do with their platform.

Although if a decent amount of retail investors lose money as a result of not being able to sell stock they already own then the blood is in the water for a class action. Saul Goodman is waiting for your call!

[+] randmeerkat|5 years ago|reply
That’s a great question, can they unilaterally shutdown trading?
[+] lldbg|5 years ago|reply
Robinhood is a private company, and are allowed to decide what types of people they want to let trade on their platform.
[+] gchokov|5 years ago|reply
OK, we've got this. Can we now stop sharing this every 5 minutes? Amateur investors lose money in the end.
[+] newfeatureok|5 years ago|reply
hide/flag the post and move on
[+] chadash|5 years ago|reply
Outwit certain parts of wall street, maybe. Any hedge fund making money off of deal flow is gonna make a huge profit when there's a big spread between buy/sell prices.
[+] betterunix2|5 years ago|reply
Not to mention any speculators who took short positions yesterday.
[+] lisper|5 years ago|reply
The high/low so far today is $514.50/$112.25. As I write this it's down 65%. What a surprise.
[+] nubb|5 years ago|reply
Platforms are banning buys for retail, ofc it's going down. If rh and td didnt ban it I bet it would be even higher.
[+] cbozeman|5 years ago|reply
Its easy for a stock to decrease in value when most of the American trading platforms don't allow Americans to buy it.
[+] beervirus|5 years ago|reply
Matt Levine:

"It seems meaningless to talk about the price of GameStop stock, as though a single number could represent such an elusive concept. GameStop stock has all the prices at once."

[+] jpxw|5 years ago|reply
Nobody is “outwitting” Wall Street here. That will become particularly apparent in the coming days.

I’ve read posts on /r/WSB where people talk about having put all of their savings into this.

I only hope that they’re just teenagers with little savings.

[+] system2|5 years ago|reply
We will be reading "I lost all my savings" posts in a few days on reddit. It is for sure GME will hit 30, and those bought it at high will be sharing their real life pain instead of memes.
[+] vannevar|5 years ago|reply
How sure are we that this is really being driven by "amateurs" and not by scammers running a pump and dump scheme under cover of a grassroots phenomenon?
[+] throwaway5752|5 years ago|reply
A stock actually has a calculable estimate of value, you know. It's the sum of future cash flows. Gamestop has been losing money for years and their outlook as a brick and mortar retailer for items that are now sold online is poor. The short sellers are correct. The business of Gamestop is bad and it's equity will be worth nothing. A short squeeze isn't going to change that in the long term.
[+] zaroth|5 years ago|reply
The problem with GME starts with the funds that managed to accumulate a 140% short interest in the stock.

Send those people to jail for illegally issuing unregistered shares of a security, or counterfeiting shares of a security, because everything that happened after that point is entirely their fault.

Alternatively, fine them $10B and issue it as a dividend to the shareholders that bought and held after Jan 1.

[+] not2b|5 years ago|reply
I liked Ars Technica's analysis of what happened. The TL,DR is that if a company's stock is so heavily shorted, so much so that the number of "borrowed" shares exceeds the number of liquid shared available, and it is not on the verge of going bankrupt, this kind of short squeeze is possible and you can get a feedback mechanism going to make the price soar, at least in the short term.

If Wall Street wants to address this, they could put limits on the number of shares that can be shorted.

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2021/01/the-complete-morons-g...