This is a fascinating case, and I'm surprised I have never heard of it before. I'm sure Apple lawyers could very easily argue that Steve Jobs' verbal "job for life" guarantee had no legal standing, and he probably wasn't authorized to make such promises despite being CEO. But the company then would also be publicly shitting on Jobs right after his death, which would be much more costly than a quick settlement.
Furthermore, while I've always disliked the "this is contrary to everything that Steve Jobs stood for" cottage industry of takes that sprung up after his death, I can say with utter conviction that there's no way Steve would have let himself be held to a "job for life" guarantee, and surely the author knew this as well as anybody when he went to court.
Not that this necessarily makes him wrong or unethical for trying to enforce the guarantee…
gogopuppygogo|5 years ago
sgt|5 years ago
paxys|5 years ago
microtherion|5 years ago
Not that this necessarily makes him wrong or unethical for trying to enforce the guarantee…
ksec|5 years ago