top | item 26110250

(no title)

adamlangsner | 5 years ago

I think you misunderstand his investment philosophy.

He's a budding value investor and his role model is Warren Buffett which means he's buying undervalued stocks that have good fundamentals.

One of the companies he says he bought is Samsung. And while there may be a correction in the future, it's self evident that Samsung is a legit company with strong fundamentals.

Also he said in the article that he's investing long term: “Rather than short-term focused day trading, I want to keep my investment for 10 to 20 years with a long-term perspective, hopefully to maximize my returns.”

Value investors and students of Warren Buffett know that part of investing this way means you need the equanimity and tenacity to weather any short term volatility.

discuss

order

valuearb|5 years ago

Warren would tell him to stay away from Samsung. Not that it’s particularly overpriced, just that the kids portfolio size opens up enormous markets where far higher return investments lurk.

When WEB started, he worked the pink sheets and small cais because he could, he was only managing a few million at the start.

He seldom went into mid or large CEOs because they tend to be much more efficiently priced. You can see the results of his narrowing pool of opportunities as his portfolio grew over the decades. He has learned more and gotten better over time, yet his 40% returns in the 50s and 60s melt into the 25% returns of the 70s/80s, and thence to 15% returns in the 2000s.

Work at it kid, turn over every rock and read a dozen financial reports a day, and don’t settle for less than 100% annualized while your portfolio is under $1M.

junippor|5 years ago

I seem to recall having read a very recent (couple years?) interview with him, where he was asked if value still worked nowadays. He said that if he only had 1 million to invest, he could still do 50% a year.

thefounder|5 years ago

Well, the issue is that after the bubble pops he will have to wait 20 years anyway to reach today's value. I fail to see how Samsung stock is undervalued.

pertymcpert|5 years ago

That has historically not been the case ever.